Open Search
Open Navigation

Is It Really This Bad for Young Women at Public Universities?

Dana Dunn's review of Elizabeth Armstrong and Laura Hamilton's book Paying for the Party: How College Maintains Inequality scared the daylights out of me. Is it really this bad for women at public universities? Does this review resonate with others, including students, recent grads, faculty, and parents? Are the perceptions in the quotation below consistent with your own perceptions? Dunn states:

Some less-affluent women choose easy majors (often opting for careers that do not require a bachelor's degree, such as wedding planning or travel management) in lieu of challenging and marketable ones (e.g., natural science, economics, finance); others party hearty so much that their grades slip precipitously while their debts mount continuously. Some transfer to regional universities, where they regroup and often succeed in a less expensive, less Greek-life centered setting; others leave school altogether; and still others hang on at MU (Midwestern University), forever on the outside looking in at the socially successful girls who master the Greek universe with ease in preparation for replicating the class structure and folkways they were born to (admittedly, often with parental support and connections that are graciously, never grudgingly, given).

Dunn goes on to note that "any end up back where they started, in small, often rural, communities with little or no professional opportunities." And later he states,

Worse yet, the administrative and student services sides of MU are complicit in maintaining, even encouraging, a class-based system that socially, educationally, and financially harms those from less-privileged backgrounds who come hoping for the promise of upward social mobility. By paying for the party, relatively few women from modest or impoverished backgrounds are able to use the college experience as a springboard for social class mobility.

Is it really this bad? If so, what can be done to improve the situation? Should women avoid public universities in favor of private schools and small liberal arts colleges, no matter what it takes?

Read the Review

College Daze and "Party Pathways": Women, Social Class, and Disadvantaged Futures
By Dana S. Dunn
PsycCRITIQUES, 2013 Vol 58(45)

You might also like

Back to Blog
Learn More
therapist talking to a couple

Pros and Cons of Being a Marriage and Family Therapist

There are numerous reasons people seek a marriage and family therapist. Among them are improving their family relationships or...

Learn More
woman talking in group meeting

How to Become an Industrial-Organizational Psychologist

If you love both commerce and psychology, it can be hard to choose between the two when deciding on a career path. Both fields can...

Learn More
woman explaining to two co-workers

Change Management vs. Change Leadership: Key Differences

In today’s highly competitive business environment, adapting to change is often what separates successful companies from...

Request Information

  • 1
    Current Select Interests
  • 2
    Provide Information