Open Search
Open Navigation

Gender, Genitals, Cutting, and Power

Alliant International University
Published 05/15/2014
2 minutes read
The content of this page is only for informational purposes and is not intended, expressly or by implication, as a guarantee of employment or salary, which vary based on many factors including but not limited to education, credentials, and experience. Alliant International University explicitly makes no representations or guarantees about the accuracy of the information provided by any prospective employer or any other website. Salary information available on the internet may not reflect the typical experience of Alliant graduates. Alliant does not guarantee that any graduate will be placed with a particular employer or in any specific employment position.

In their review of Genital Cutting: Protecting Children From Medical, Cultural, and Religious Infringements, Sussie Eshun and Irina Khusid note how long the circumcision debate has gone on, the differences in attitudes about male and female circumcision, and the need to provide parents with balanced education and information on the topic. However, the reviewers note the difficulty that parents have in obtaining clear, evidence-based information on circumcision. In Western industrialized nations there is little debate over female circumcision; it is considered wrong and is referred to as mutilation. The opposite is true for male circumcision. It is generally presented as a beneficial medical procedure and is deeply rooted in cultural and religious tradition. Medical and religious support for male circumcision creates a power imbalance in this culture that prevents debate, just as the strength of male power and cultural tradition limits discussions of female circumcision in those societies that practice it.

Eshun and Khusid suggest that parents receive information and education on male circumcision prior to the birth of a child and that they be informed that this is an elective medical procedure. However, is this recommendation sufficient, given medical and cultural sentiment? Can parents who see this practice as a violation of the child’s human rights who wish to decline it for other reasons comfortably do so? How do uncircumcised males handle the stigma of being uncircumcized?  Does decision science or social psychology have anything to contribute to this ongoing debate?

 

Read the Review

Circumcision: Old-Time Tradition or Medical Necessity? A Critical Review of the Pros and Cons of an Old, Long Debate

      By Sussie Eshun and Irina Khusid
PsycCRITIQUES, 2014 Vol 59(19)

You might also like

Back to Blog
Learn More
Truvette Hollinquest

Alumni Spotlight: Q&A with Truvette Hollinquest

Alumni Spotlight: Q&A with Truvette Hollinquest California School of Professional Psychology at Alliant International University...

Learn More
Alliant International University

Alumni Spotlight: Q&A with Dr. Sheetal Siledar-Lee

Alumni Spotlight: Q&A with Dr. Sheetal Siledar-Lee California School of Professional Psychology at Alliant International...

Learn More
Alliant International University

What to Look For in Psychology Graduate Programs

What to Look For in Psychology Graduate Programs The process of getting a graduate degree in psychology can feel confusing at...

Anchor
students of LGBT Certificate program standing on floor with slogan

Start on your path to impact today.